Keyword summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Swat Team results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 803 hits . Analysis detected 5,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,621 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (34,705 of 37,536 keywords). This Swat Team is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. Swat Team
Keyword details
Total words: 9,621
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst