Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Landscaping results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Nature, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 1,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 556 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,392 of 37,536 keywords). This Sustainable Landscaping is worse (more manipulative) than 93.60% of the peer group.
Sustainable Landscaping
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
94%Sustainable Landscaping (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 556
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

94% percentile
025507510093.6% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles556 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 25.7%25.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 20.1%20.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos