Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suspects results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 504 hits . Analysis detected 3,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,640 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,105 of 37,162 keywords). This Suspects is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Suspects
Keyword details
Total words: 5,640
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst