Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Oral Arguments results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 6,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,042 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (19,263 of 37,536 keywords). This Supreme Court Oral Arguments is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 6,042
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos