Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video878 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Appeal results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 2,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,512 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,712 of 37,536 keywords). This Supreme Court Appeal is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Supreme Court Appeal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Supreme Court Appeal (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,512
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos