Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplements results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Burden of Proof, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 929 hits. Analysis detected 4,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,463 of 37,530 keywords). This Supplements is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Supplements
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
9%Supplements (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,712
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos