Keyword summary
15% 2 analyzed articles/videos 618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Superior National Forest results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 3,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,015 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (27,427 of 35,607 keywords). This Superior National Forest is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Superior National Forest
Keyword details
Total words: 6,015
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst