Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Superintelligence results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 903 hits. Analysis detected 7,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Superintelligence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Superintelligence
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Superintelligence (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,800
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Straw Man: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos