Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Super Speeders results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 245 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (15,510 of 37,536 keywords). This Super Speeders is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Super Speeders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠59%Super Speeders (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos