Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Super Bowl 60 results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 803 hits . Analysis detected 2,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 82% (7,098 of 37,536 keywords). This Super Bowl 60 is worse (more manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Super Bowl 60
Keyword details
Total words: 2,106
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.1% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 38.1% 38.1% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst