Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Summit County results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 811 hits. Analysis detected 5,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,206 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (17,097 of 37,536 keywords). This Summit County is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Summit County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠55%Summit County (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,206
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos