Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sugar House Park results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 644 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,542 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 63% (13,991 of 37,536 keywords). This Sugar House Park is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Sugar House Park
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Sugar House Park (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,542
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos