Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Suffolk County results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,031 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,655 of 37,536 keywords). This Suffolk County is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Suffolk County
Keyword details
Total words: 5,031
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst