Keyword summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos1,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sudan War results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 1,679 hits. Analysis detected 5,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,244 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,861 of 37,536 keywords). This Sudan War is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Sudan War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Sudan War (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,244
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate