Keyword summary
49% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Success results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 621 hits . Analysis detected 5,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,912 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,379 of 37,528 keywords). This Success is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. Success
Keyword details
Total words: 6,912
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst