Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subway Safety results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 152 hits . Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,287 of 37,536 keywords). This Subway Safety is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Subway Safety
Keyword details
Total words: 2,440
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst