Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 501 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Athletes results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 648 hits . Analysis detected 3,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,971 of 37,536 keywords). This Student Athletes is worse (more manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Student Athletes
Keyword details
Total words: 2,004
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.4% percentile 6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 32.3% 32.3% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst