Keyword summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Fails To Save The Universe results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 1,538 hits. Analysis detected 5,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,827 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (24,795 of 37,536 keywords). This Stuart Fails To Save The Universe is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Stuart Fails To Save The Universe
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,827
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos