Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stock Act results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 1,034 hits . Analysis detected 8,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,024 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,928 of 37,536 keywords). This Stock Act is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Stock Act
Keyword details
Total words: 6,024
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.6% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst