Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Cheung results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 623 hits . Analysis detected 2,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,339 of 37,536 keywords). This Steven Cheung is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Steven Cheung
Keyword details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.8% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 34.8% 34.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Red Herring: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst