Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,291 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Eustaquio results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 2,875 hits . Analysis detected 9,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,068 of 37,536 keywords). This Stephen Eustaquio is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Stephen Eustaquio
Keyword details
Total words: 9,164
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.4% 31.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst