Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Step Up Program results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 221 hits. Analysis detected 1,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Step Up Program is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Step Up Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Step Up Program (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,693
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos