Keyword summary
34%2 analyzed articles/videos1,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steel results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 3,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,915 of 37,536 keywords). This Steel is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Steel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
34%Steel (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,632
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate