Keyword summary
34% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,544 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steel results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 423 hits . Analysis detected 3,676 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,632 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,915 of 37,536 keywords). This Steel is better (less manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Steel
Keyword details
Total words: 4,632
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst