Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video535 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Statin Weight Gain results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 161 hits. Analysis detected 795 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (30,890 of 35,817 keywords). This Statin Weight Gain is better (less manipulative) than 86.20% of the peer group.
Statin Weight Gain
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠14%Statin Weight Gain (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos