Keyword summary
â 97% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Statements results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 200 hits . Analysis detected 2,318 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of â 74% (9,711 of 36,446 keywords). This Statements is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Statements
Keyword details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.4% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst