Keyword summary
61%1 analyzed article/video1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Lawmakers results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 2,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,867 of 37,533 keywords). This State Lawmakers is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
State Lawmakers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%State Lawmakers (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,072
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos