Keyword summary
⁠13%2 analyzed articles/videos2,493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Star Trek Strange New Worlds results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 784 hits. Analysis detected 3,177 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,479 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (36,480 of 37,536 keywords). This Star Trek Strange New Worlds is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Star Trek Strange New Worlds
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,479
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.8% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos