Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford Stadium results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 2,818 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,251 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,738 of 37,533 keywords). This Stanford Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Stanford Stadium
Keyword details
Total words: 4,251
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst