Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stalinism results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Overconfidence Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,263 hits. Analysis detected 10,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,626 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Stalinism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stalinism
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Stalinism (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,626
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos