Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stadium District results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 258 hits. Analysis detected 1,979 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (27,586 of 37,536 keywords). This Stadium District is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Stadium District
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠27%Stadium District (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos