Keyword summary
20%1 analyzed article/video910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stabilization Payments results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 344 hits. Analysis detected 1,643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,730 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,371 of 37,536 keywords). This Stabilization Payments is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Stabilization Payments
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%Stabilization Payments (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,730
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos