Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos603 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Region results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 646 hits. Analysis detected 4,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,379 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Region is worse (more manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group.
St Louis Region
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
97%St Louis Region (selected)12%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,636
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510096.3% percentile
11.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 38.1%38.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 39.5%39.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 27.9%27.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 24.4%24.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 39.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 38.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 34.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate