Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spice Girls results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 225 hits . Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 23% (29,045 of 37,536 keywords). This Spice Girls is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group. Spice Girls
Keyword details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst