Keyword summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Operations Medics results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 267 hits. Analysis detected 1,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (22,533 of 37,536 keywords). This Special Operations Medics is better (less manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Special Operations Medics
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510040.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos