Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Investigations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,369 hits . Analysis detected 9,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,661 of 37,536 keywords). This Special Investigations is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Special Investigations
Keyword details
Total words: 11,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst