Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Elections results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,106 hits. Analysis detected 6,110 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,301 of 37,536 keywords). This Special Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Special Elections
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Special Elections (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510072.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos