Keyword summary
65%1 analyzed article/video1,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spay And Neuter results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,591 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (17,555 of 35,638 keywords). This Spay And Neuter is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Spay And Neuter
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
51%Spay And Neuter (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,591
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos