Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spartanburg results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 1,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,991 of 37,536 keywords). This Spartanburg is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Spartanburg
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%Spartanburg (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos