Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Korea Japan Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 568 hits . Analysis detected 2,839 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (9,900 of 35,997 keywords). This South Korea Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. South Korea Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Special Pleading: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst