Keyword summary
57%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Source Memphis Commercial Appeal results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (21,420 of 55,159 keywords). This Source Memphis Commercial Appeal is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos