Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Elmhirst results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 54% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of 99% (383 of 37,536 keywords). This Sophie Elmhirst is worse (more manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Sophie Elmhirst
Keyword details
Total words: 567
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.0% percentile 19.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles567 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 49.4% 49.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 54.0% 54.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 32.1% 32.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 34.4% 34.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 38.8% 38.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 54.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 49.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 34.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 32.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst