Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophie Cunnnigham results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 907 hits . Analysis detected 4,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,922 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,558 of 37,536 keywords). This Sophie Cunnnigham is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Sophie Cunnnigham
Keyword details
Total words: 2,922
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.0% 31.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Middle Ground: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst