Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socialites results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 5,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,884 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,368 of 35,076 keywords). This Socialites is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Socialites
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
79%Socialites (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,884
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate