Keyword summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Ban In Australia results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Framing Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 12 hits. Analysis detected 12 faulty-reasoning hits from 292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (11,390 of 55,396 keywords). This Social Media Ban In Australia is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Social Media Ban In Australia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠80%Social Media Ban In Australia (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles292 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos