Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Media Addiction Trial results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 4,590 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (23,276 of 34,692 keywords). This Social Media Addiction Trial is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Social Media Addiction Trial
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
33%Social Media Addiction Trial (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos