Keyword summary
77%1 analyzed article/video1,393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Snoop Dogg results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 2,154 hits. Analysis detected 5,294 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,410 of 37,536 keywords). This Snoop Dogg is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Snoop Dogg
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
78%Snoop Dogg (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 51.5%51.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 51.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos