Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Slate Auto results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 4,099 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,727 of 37,536 keywords). This Slate Auto is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Slate Auto
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
16%Slate Auto (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos