Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sistema De Analisis De Bajas De Defensa results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 602 hits. Analysis detected 3,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,155 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 35,923 keywords). This Sistema De Analisis De Bajas De Defensa is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sistema De Analisis De Bajas De Defensa
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Sistema De Analisis De Bajas De Defensa (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,155
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos