Keyword summary
92%1 analyzed article/video493 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Siff Cinema Workers Union results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 225 hits. Analysis detected 1,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,479 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,705 of 37,536 keywords). This Siff Cinema Workers Union is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Siff Cinema Workers Union
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,479
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos