Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shergar results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 828 hits . Analysis detected 6,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,573 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,565 of 37,536 keywords). This Shergar is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Shergar
Keyword details
Total words: 4,573
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst